'An Examination of the Power of the Dark Side\r'

'Entrepreneurship does have a darkening billet and It Is powerful, Indeed. With r atomic get along 18 exceptions, the literature about entrepreneurship Is substantiative and supportive and implies that uniform benefits accrue to the economy, to businesses, and to individuals as a result of entrepreneurship. This is only half the story. A pocket-sized number of researchers have examined the dysfunctional aspects of entrepreneurship and pointed out that a Dark Side definitely exists (Sets De Varies, 1985; Solomon & Winslow, 988; Winslow & Solomon, 1987; 1989).This paper pass on look at those who turned to the Dark Side for their very existence. The authors have surveyed pris starrs who have been convicted of a felony and who are serving sentences In a Federal prison house in the Midwest. The participants were enrolled In a continuing differentiatement course Involving entrepreneurship and sm whole business startup Ideas and they all espoused a desire to â€Å"go stra ight” when their sentences had been served. How did they produce poisonouss? Did they view their criminal satellites as entrepreneurial ventures? provide they become legitimate entrepreneurs in the future? piece of ass entrepreneurship education alleviate the problems faced by these offenders when released and is at that place a greater or littleer possibility of acidifies when these inmates are given the opportunity to study entrepreneurship maculation still incarcerated? If they exist, are Dark Side Entrepreneurs antithetic from main stream Entrepreneurs? These were the questions which drove our research. A major problem facing society today Is the clash that the growing number of inmates serving sentences have on the economic vitality of our nation.The problem has been exacerbated because our Jails are not only filled with first time-offenders but with a large population of repeat offenders, those returned to prison because heritable were unmade to malting a crim e-Tree Testily rater Deluge released. harmonise to the Bureau of Justice (2000), in the United States released prisoners were re-arrested at an average rate that was greater than 60%. The proud percentage of re-arrested former prisoners is a clear denotation that Just serving ones sentence is not a deterrent to committing more criminal acts.The economic salute to society and to those directly affected by criminal activity is tremendous. match to the Bureau of Justice (2000), one of every fifteen people in the U. S. ordain be incarcerated. That figure is staggering. During the past 25 years, the penal system in the United States has implemented a strategy of â€Å"lock ‘me up and throw external the key. ” As a result, thither has been an unprecedented outgrowth in the prison population in the number of incarcerated inmates even though the crime rate has been decreasing.Further exacerbate the situation is that incredibly high rate of recidivism. According to the Three State Recidivism Study (Stouter, Smith, and Tracy, 2001) released inmates reported that less than half had a Job awaiting them aft(prenominal) they were freed from prison. term most (about 87% of those who had received training hammock in prison and 83% of those who did not inscribe in training) believed that they had a place to stay after they were released, the remainder were released as homeless, left to roam the streets, in general in urban areas.The economic cost of enslavement and the cost to society of criminal activity, plus the woolly wages due to imprisonment of convicted workers and the cost of providing well-being for their families is creating a substantial burden on local, state and federal budgets. The combination of rising costs multiply by an ever greater number of incarcerated inmates is lay pressure on the penal system to become an alternative, deter strategy for success after release. Is there a strategy that can lead to a lower prisoner populati on through a decrease in recidivism?\r\n'