Nikita Khrushchev Nikita

Khrushchev was a self-make man, even with his unfortunate and uncut upbringing he still managed to cook a name for himself. He became one of the most powerful and influential leaders In Russia, simultaneously holding the offices of Premier of the U. S. S. R. And First Secretary of the Communist Party. Strong willed, and committed, Nikkei Khrushchev fought for what he look atd in and striver to make his countrified, Russia, a better place. Nikolas Khrushchev was natural In a southern Russian village of Slovakia on April 5th 1894 .He was born into a poor family as a result he had to religious service his father take care of the family at the tender age of 15 . Ata young age he learned how to work hard and manage for himself, which is one of the reason he was such a strong leader, pack could relate to him more than the upper and middle class politicians. He was and then drafted Into the Czarist host during World War I and soon subsequently willingly Joined the communist par ty and the Russian Red army stood against the white army , people who favored the Czar Nobility.He got the education he needed as an adult so he could be found secretary of the communist party Committee. As he rose to power, he never used it to manipulate or harm his people unconnected his successor Joseph Stalin. He believed his only Job, as a leader was to make his people happy and restore the lost honor of Russia. He cute Russia to be Just as advanced as Its rival country united States. He launched programs to promote cultivation, heavy Industrial and military production.HIS jut for agriculture had a huge Impact n soviet life, since bleak tractors and machinery were to be built it created more jobs, which boosted the Russian economy. It also increased the beat of crops produced during harvest by almost triple the amount of crops . One of his of import policies was peaceful coexistence it assumes a readiness to solve all outstanding issues without resorting to lunge by me ans of negotiation and reasonable compromises. For example, he openly did non agree with capitalist but he still believed underlying Issues could be worked out without war.He didnt believe In forcing his Ideas on people and that people should believe what they wanted to without being penalized, it was almost like a democracy. Although he did about good things for his country, many historians disagree that Nikkei benefited Russia (Soviet Union) at all. In Fact some wonder if events such as the Berlin Scrolls would excite happened If someone else ruled the Soviet union. The Berlin Mles crisis was a huge misunderstanding. All countries were fetching directions. The U.S installed several rockets sites all over Europe and one appended to be in range to strike Moscow, the Capital of the Soviet union. As a precaution the soviets put missiles in Cuba that could strike almost any portion of the U. S . Any leader would have reacted this way but his funding of the missile development at the expense of naval and regular forces had alienated the military. They opine he failed to revive soviet agriculture because the steps taken to master his peace, he should have known that the capitalists would not succumb to his policies without a pocketable force.In order for his policies to succeed he would need the full or philanthropy support of his people. In contrast I dont conceptualize he failed, the agriculture industry boomed, and the economy skyrocketed because he created more Jobs. He also made his country more technologically advanced than any other convention could. For example, tractors, missiles etcetera. Even though historians say he cause havoc, I dont think he should be blamed for the Berlin crisis, soviet-U. S antagonism would largely have remained and the world would still have been trapped in a shivery war.