Islam’s Problems come from within Essay

* Criticism of propaganda type which piece leaders try to persuade the world this isnt about Islam* Rushdie argues that by giving examples how it is a) support of Bin affluent b) the Moslem together coming for the jihad c) the anti-Semitism blaming Jews for the September eleventh issues etc.* Rushdie suggests a reasoning for the above written from fear of the westward taking over there old-fashioned traditional way of life.* He emphasizing how it is about Islam many political movements are now point by radical Islamic organizations such(prenominal)(prenominal) as the revolutionary Shiite of Iran or the Taliban.* Rushdie continues by introducing a vital key point to his article. He criticizes such political groups for blaming outsiders for all the ills of Muslim societies. He then suggests that they are to throw responsibility of their problems and then they may be able to solve their problems by themselves.* Rushdie continues by showing how many Muslims are beginning to ask th emselves such questions. He gives some specific examples of intellectuals of the Muslim world relating to that question.* He concludes by suggesting that the way to overcome the problem with terrorism today is by secularist-humanist principles which mustiness(prenominal) be taken on by the Islam.In terms of what we contribute learned, we would have to say that Rushdie argument is legitimate. We can come to that conclusion by simply looking at his arguments Rushdie doesnt introduce new development in his conclusions relating to an argument. If the question of validity refers to the detail that Islam is the topic related to the terror attacks in September, then the argument can well be valid to a certain extent. However, it would morally be incorrect to blame a religion for this mass murdering, as we know that generalizing that all Muslims are murders, is wrong and invalid.Although, one could argue the majority of the arguments Rushdie makes, the way he wrote them they are val id.Rushdie presumptively has a strong historical knowledge to support his articles arguments. However, I conceptualise a great deal of emotions came in play while expressing himself. We must not forget that Rushdies incur with the Islamic, (in direct reference to the fact he was ordered to be killed by a major Islamic leader) hence a possible bias on the issue. I to the full understand such a standpoint as that of Rushdie I too, when am asked to support my countries actions in regard to the Palestinian terror attacks, tend to operate emotional and very protective. Therefore I understand the pressure exempt Rushdie experiences while expressing himself. Therefore I can also say from experience that I do not think that in such a state Rushdie would exaggerate to a point of absurd.